Jump to content

TOW-2 and Reactive Armor


junkers
Go to solution Solved by Ssnake,

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone, I just started playing this game. How effective is the TOW-2 BGM-7D anti-tank missile against reactive armor? The game shows that it can penetrate the frontal armor with reactive armor, but Wikipedia shows that it has no series explosives. What is the real situation? (I know that the focus of this game is not on the analysis of tank damage, I am just curious)

屏幕截图 2024-12-14 000957.png

屏幕截图 2024-12-14 001027.png

屏幕截图 2024-12-14 001112.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
  • Solution

TOW-2 is a singular HEAT warhead. Tandem charges are indicated in SB Pro nomenclature by adding an Asterisk (e.g., "TOW-2A*"); top-attack munitions come with a Caret (e.g., "TOW-2B^")

 

In your example, the Kontakt-1 reactive armor will degrade the warhead to some degree, but TOW-2 is still so powerful that it punches through regardless. Tandem warheads will not be addected by ERA tiles as the precursor charge would neutralize them before the main charge's HEAT jet arrives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This IDF Magach 6B (M60A1 RISE) was hit by two HOT ATGMs launched from a Syrian Gazelle helicopter.

The first missile hit the turret side, where the Blazer ERA tiles degraded the penetration ability of the HEAT jet. It was still powerful enough to make that visible hole in the armor, despite the angle, but failed to achieve a full penetration.

The crew then bailed out, carrying the wounded TC (company CO). Immediately after, a second missile hit the hull side, where there was no ERA, and set the tank ablaze.

500th armored brigade near Kafr Nabrakh, June 8th 1982.  

 

image.thumb.jpeg.544b90d0e4066b0bdc7935f6b318587b.jpeg

image.thumb.jpeg.c8b49cef3cc56cd841047308706fd3bc.jpeg

image.jpeg.05b7199cb853216d69e02589f762956d.jpeg

Edited by Iarmor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In short, reactive armor - explosive or not - will degrade but not neutralize incoming HEAT jets.

In the other direction, tandem HEAT warheads will neutralize the (first) layer of ERA elements, but only those. The main (passive) armor still needs to be overcome by the main charge. And, of course, we have mechanisms in place that may yield a less than totally destructive result if previous armor layers have sufficiently reduced the power of the HEAT jet.

Even active protection systems won't magically dissolve the projectile; if premature detonation occurs, the round may easily have 50% of it's nominal power left. Without passive armor you'd still have a bad day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/15/2024 at 4:16 PM, Iarmor said:

This IDF Magach 6B (M60A1 RISE) was hit by two HOT ATGMs launched from a Syrian Gazelle helicopter.

The first missile hit the turret side, where the Blazer ERA tiles degraded the penetration ability of the HEAT jet. It was still powerful enough to make that visible hole in the armor, despite the angle, but failed to achieve a full penetration.

The crew then bailed out, carrying the wounded TC (company CO). Immediately after, a second missile hit the hull side, where there was no ERA, and set the tank ablaze.

500th armored brigade near Kafr Nabrakh, June 8th 1982.  

 

image.thumb.jpeg.544b90d0e4066b0bdc7935f6b318587b.jpeg

image.thumb.jpeg.c8b49cef3cc56cd841047308706fd3bc.jpeg

image.jpeg.05b7199cb853216d69e02589f762956d.jpeg

Very interesting historical photos!  That's a great example of ERA at work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/15/2024 at 7:54 PM, Ssnake said:

In short, reactive armor - explosive or not - will degrade but not neutralize incoming HEAT jets.

In the other direction, tandem HEAT warheads will neutralize the (first) layer of ERA elements, but only those. The main (passive) armor still needs to be overcome by the main charge. And, of course, we have mechanisms in place that may yield a less than totally destructive result if previous armor layers have sufficiently reduced the power of the HEAT jet.

Even active protection systems won't magically dissolve the projectile; if premature detonation occurs, the round may easily have 50% of it's nominal power left. Without passive armor you'd still have a bad day.

I think some ERA is better than others at degrading the incoming weapon.

 

Kontakt 1 and Blazer for example work only against single unitary HEAT warheads.

 

Kontakt 5, Relikt, Kaktus, Nozh (either in its own casing or adapted to Kontakt 1 casings as seems common currently), and other similar Heavy ERAs, will probably be even more effective against a single HEAT warhead, and provide some protection against KE attacks as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...