iamfritz Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Ssnake Posted May 9 Members Share Posted May 9 Yay, engineers! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamfritz Posted May 10 Author Share Posted May 10 4 hours ago, Ssnake said: Yay, engineers! Right!? After all I've read about them in war histories, I've finally figured out how to involve them. Draws the battle out, but it's realistic! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonm Posted May 10 Share Posted May 10 (edited) 17 hours ago, iamfritz said: Right!? After all I've read about them in war histories, I've finally figured out how to involve them. Draws the battle out, but it's realistic! For the full experience, now add: Dismounted Infantry to secure the far bank Prelim smoke to obscure the crossing site Perhaps do it in the dark ... Edited May 10 by Gibsonm 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lt DeFault Posted May 10 Share Posted May 10 It is a good feeling when you can overcome a tactical problem with such a specialized asset. That's exactly why I included a [scripted] bridge layer in my old "Burning Sands" scenario. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamfritz Posted May 10 Author Share Posted May 10 16 hours ago, Gibsonm said: For the full experience, now add: Dismounted Infantry o secure he far bank Prelim smoke to obscure the crossing site Perhaps do it in the dark ... I did breeze over the FM-XX manual section about crossing water obstacles (that's close to what it was) and in my above pic 2 you see smoke. I had tanks flanking all around the Biber just in case. But ya I shoulda used infantry. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.