TSe419E

Duh. If you designed a tank to cover every contingency this is what you will have:

The 105 in the Booker is meant to support infantry in the rear areas of an enemy not engage tanks on the front line.

Yes.

Yes, you are. They don't charge full price to upgrade an already existing license.

When waiting for an engagement to occur the loader wouldn't be standing around holding an extra round. It's too heavy and he might have to do something in the meantime that required the use of one, or both, of his hands. A loader, when "lap loading" would take out the appropriate second round only after hearing the fire command just so that the situation you describe wouldn't happen. Then, after loading the round into the breech, immediately get another round of the same type, if available, from the ready rack (or the first four to six spots of upright rack next to the main gun, making sure to stay out of the path of recoil). Lap loading can be done on the move provided the ground the tank is moving over is not too rough. Of course it helps if there are so many empty casings piled around the loader's feet that he can't move them (been there, done that). For me the reloading process of the M60s is too slow. There seems to be, to me anyway, a very noticeable delay between the main gun firing and the loader starting to take a round out of a rack position.

Was this the primary sight or the auxiliary sight?

I'll take H-4, please.

C2, please.

A1-4, please.

Yes, but you can't do it in a multiplayer session.

I wish locking the F8 view to the turret was still possible. I know you cut it off because you thought that it gave an unfair warning when it zoomed in on a target but that is not what I want. I just want the view to align with the turret for video purposes.

Sorry guys. Brain farted about DST.

I’ll be there.

I’m pretty sure the ones the GA NG used at Ft Stewart had AOS like the M60A1s the 24th ID used. I remember there being “fire on the move” engagements the one time I was a score keeper when they shot TT VII. A -10 for the M48A5 would solve the issue but I haven’t seen one.

2A, because somebody’s got to do it. Although the thought of an M901 is tempting.